Skip to main content

Richard’s family was at risk with no landline service

The complaint
Richard, living in a rural, high fire risk area with no mobile coverage, relies on his landline for emergency calls. Despite having Priority Assistance, his landline has had issues for 10 years. After it stopped working entirely, a temporary fix was made, but the service failed again.
The outcome
Our investigation revealed that the telecommunications provider knew in 2014 that the lead-in needed replacement but delayed it until 2022. Despite Richard’s lack of mobile coverage, no interim service was provided during the fault period. Eventually, the parties agreed to resolve the complaint, and Richard received a settlement of over $2,000.

The issue

Richard lives in a rural, high fire risk area and has an InContact landline service with his telecommunications provider. Since Richard’s wife has a serious medical condition, he also has a Priority Assistance service on the landline. Living in a mobile blackspot area meant that when his landline stopped working, he had to travel over 1km from home to call emergency services.

Richard had experienced continual intermittent issues on his landline service for the last 10 years and often reported these faults to his telecommunications provider. One day, the landline stopped working entirely. Richard’s telecommunications provider sent a technician out who laid a cable on the ground so the landline would work, but this was only a temporary fix.

The technician told Richard they only completed a temporary fix and that they needed to permanently fix the line through additional works. Soon after, the service stopped working again, and Richard came to our office for assistance.

The investigation

Through our investigation we discovered that the telecommunications provider was aware of the need to permanently replace the lead-in in 2014 but did not replace it until 2022. Despite Richard having no mobile coverage at his address, his telecommunications provider did not supply an interim service during the fault period, even when Richard requested it. 

The outcome

After some time, the parties were able to reach an agreement to resolve the complaint, and Richard’s telecommunications provider paid him a settlement amount over $2,000.

*Names of all parties have been changed.

How we've helped other customers

Complaint
Tamin Tutoring signed up for an NBN service and equipment bundle with BlockTel but experienced frequent faults with slow and dropped video calls and inconsistent phone calls. When they tried to cancel due to these issues, BlockTel demanded over $7,000 for early termination.
Outcome
Tamin Tutoring didn’t want to pay this cancellation fee because the service never worked properly. After complaining to our office, the parties agreed that Tamin Tutoring could exit its contract and only pay 40 per cent of the cost of the cancellation fees.
Complaint
Tamin Tutoring signed up for an NBN service and equipment bundle with BlockTel but experienced frequent faults with slow and dropped video calls and inconsistent phone calls. When they tried to cancel due to these issues, BlockTel demanded over $7,000 for early termination.
Outcome
Tamin Tutoring didn’t want to pay this cancellation fee because the service never worked properly. After complaining to our office, the parties agreed that Tamin Tutoring could exit its contract and only pay 40 per cent of the cost of the cancellation fees.