TIO Annual Report 2004/05
Complaint handling performance
The TIO aims to ensure that investigations and decisions are procedurally
and substantively fair. Investigations must be thorough and decisions
must always be transparent, with both parties to a dispute viewing
all available evidence. All decisions must be explained, with reference
to available evidence, in a clear and logical manner. The right
of a complainant to respond to preliminary assessments, or to request
a review of unfavourable decisions, has also been made clearer by
modifying relevant correspondence from the TIO.
Complaint handling benchmarks
In early 2005, the Council approved new complaint handling benchmarks,
which cover timeframes for all aspects of complaints - from initial
calls, e-mails and letters to the TIO through to the assessment
of members’ responses and subsequent advice to complainants.
These benchmarks are reasonable, but the unpredicted increase in
complaints this year has meant that many of them are not being met.
Call handling performance
Calls averaged about 2,400 a week until just after last year’s
Annual Report launch, in November, when they began to rise sharply.
Just before Christmas they averaged about 2,900 each week and reached
3,600 a week in mid-June 2005. The increase meant that significant
pressure was placed on TIO staff just to maintain acceptable service
levels and stem the number of abandoned calls.
Throughout July and August 2004, the TIO failed to meet its service
level of answering 80% of calls within 60 seconds. The recruitment
of 10 Enquiry Officers during this period ensured that the service
level began to be met in September with this performance being maintained
until February when sharply increasing call numbers again led to
another round of recruitment. This helped service levels rise above
80% by May. The average service level for the year was 77% - just
under the required performance of 80% of calls answered within 60
seconds.
This year’s increase in complaints was far greater than predicted,
reflecting greater industry activity in an environment where public
awareness of the TIO is probably fairly static. There is no single
issue that can account for this increase. Rather it is a reflection
of several things including:
- increasing industry competition for customers
- increasing take-up of new technologies such as broadband and
new services such as premium-rate SMS
- poor industry performance in customer service and complaint
handling
- increased consumer debt
- a very rapid rise in mobile complaints concerning one carrier.
Complaint mix
Case mix (percentage)
| Year |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
| 1999/00 |
93.5 |
4.2 |
2.2 |
0.1 |
| 2000/01 |
92.8 |
4.8 |
2.3 |
0.1 |
| 2001/02 |
91.0 |
6.7 |
2.2 |
0.1 |
| 2002/03 |
88.6 |
8.6 |
2.7 |
0.1 |
| 2003/04 |
89.7 |
7.8 |
2.5 |
0.1 |
| 2004/05 |
90.2 |
7.7 |
2.1 |
0.1 |
In 2004/05, 90.2% of all complaints were resolved at level 1, without
the need for a formal TIO investigation. This represents a 0.5 percentage
point increase on last year. The high demand for TIO resources has
meant that many matters that ordinarily would be investigated formally
have been resolved by Enquiry Officers spending additional time informally
liaising with members.
There is no indication that members’ performance in relation
to complaint handling in the first instance, let alone once a matter
has come to the TIO, is improving. On the contrary; only five years
ago about 93% of complaints were resolved at first instance. The
fact that now almost 10% of complaints to the TIO cannot be resolved
without formal investigation is a poor reflection of industry performance
in this area.
Level 2s made up 7.7% of all complaints, compared with 7.8% last
year. 2.1% of all complaints (2.5% last year) were subsequently
unable to be resolved at level 2 and were escalated to level 3.
The high rate of escalations is one of the most serious and costly
issues facing providers as members of the
TIO Scheme.
Complaint resolution times
Complaint resolution average (in days)
| Year |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
| 2002/03 |
63 |
80 |
104 |
| 2003/04 |
61 |
84 |
146 |
| 2004/05 |
65 |
88 |
110 |
The average number of days taken to resolve level 2 and 3 complaints
increased slightly, with level 2s up to 65 from 61, and level 3s
up to 88 from 84. Given our backlog and the increasing complexity
of cases, these figures are considered acceptable. The average time
taken to resolve a level 4 complaint fell from 146 to 110 days,
a pleasing result.
> NEXT Complaint outcomes
|