TIO Logo
   Home
  About Us
  Consumers
  Consumer   Advocates
  News

   " " Media
  Statements

   " " Complaint
  Statistics

  " " FAQs
  Publications
  Useful Links
  Contact Us
  Site Map
  Members of   Scheme

Website Search

Enter Keyword/s
   Home | News | Publications | Annual Reports | 2003/2004 | Summary of Complaint Handling Performance | Complaint Outcomes

TIO Annual Report 2003/04

Summary of Complaint Handling Performance

Complaint Outcomes
Complaint Outcomes %
Neutral 16.4%
Partially in favour of complainant 17.3%
Partially in favour of member 3.4%
Substantially in favour of complainant 44.7%
Substantially in favour of member 18.1%

When a Level 2, 3 or 4 complaint is closed or resolved, staff record an ‘outcome’. This is based on their understanding of whether the complainant believes the case to have been resolved partially or substantially in their favour, or partially or substantially in the Member’s favour.

Neutral outcomes are also recorded but these are mainly where a Level 2 or 3 complaint has not been resolved and requires escalation and further investigation, or where a complaint has had several ‘issues’ but only one has been formally investigated.

In 2003/04, there was a significant increase in the percentage of complaints judged to have been resolved partially or substantially in favour of the complainant - 62.0% - up from 54.9% in 2002/03. Correspondingly, complaints judged to be partially or substantially resolved in favour of the Member dropped from 24.1% last financial year to 21.5% in 2003/04.

This is a disappointing result, indicating that Members may not always fully investigate and resolve complaints in a fair and reasonable manner until the TIO becomes involved. On the other hand, ACIF Codes and TIO Position Statements now form benchmarks against which proposed outcomes can more easily be judged fair and reasonable. Members should always examine these tools when they are handling complaints internally. This might lead to a decrease in the number of complaints to the TIO.

> NEXT Reviews


Read our Accessibility Statement and Privacy Policy © 2001 Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd