| TIO Talks 35 | |||
| Issue
35, December 2005 |
|||
6. Review of Cases |
|||
|
Complainants who are not satisfied with the outcome of their complaint may request an independent review by the TIO’s Review Officer. The Review Officer’s primary focus when reviewing a complaint is
to ensure that a fair and reasonable outcome has been achieved. The Review
Officer ensures that: The Review Officer reports directly to the Deputy Ombudsman, and is responsible for independently reviewing the outcome of Enquiries and level 1, 2, 3, and in some instances, administrative level 4 complaints. In 2004/05, 338 reviews were requested, a 3.7% increase from the previous year. During the same period, the TIO completed a total of 300 reviews. In 70% of cases, the Review Officer concluded that a complete and thorough investigation had been conducted by the Investigations or Enquiry Officer, and agreed that a fair and reasonable outcome to the complaint had been achieved. In 17.6% of cases, additional information was sought before concluding that a fair and reasonable outcome had been achieved in the first instance. 11% of cases were returned to the relevant Investigations or Enquiry Officer for further investigation. In 1.4% of cases, the TIO’s initial finding was overturned following additional investigation of the complaint. TIO members TIO members may ask for the classification of a complaint against them to be reconsidered. These requests should initially be directed to the Investigation or Enquiry Officer handling the complaint and are considered on a case-by-case basis. If a member is dissatisfied with the way in which its request or enquiry
has been handled, it may ask that the matter be referred to the Member
Communications Adviser. In handling requests for reclassification, the
TIO seeks to ensure that its guidelines for classification have been appropriately
and fairly applied. |
|||
| > NEXT: 7. Consumer Contracts Code | |||