Newsbriefs
TIO Position Statements on the Extension
of Unlimited Credit and Over-Commitment
The TIO commonly investigates billing complaints where the complainant
has been billed for an uncharacteristically high value of telephone
calls or internet charges, and finds themselves in a position of
over-commitment.
Over-commitment by consumers of telephone services most often arises
as a result of calls to third-party services, including 190X premium
rate services and other services accessed via an international prefix,
but may also arise through calls to ordinary long distance and mobile
numbers, and as a result of excess internet usage charges.
The TIO has recently developed position statements that outline
the TIO’s approach to cases of financial over-commitment due
to the extension of unlimited credit by a telecommunications provider.
The first deals specifically with premium rate services while the
second deals with over-commitment arising via other means.
Generally speaking, where a consumer brings a complaint to the
TIO about a bill(s) for an uncharacteristically high value of telephone
calls or Internet charges, the TIO will consider investigating depending
on the individual circumstances of the complaint. In each and every
case the TIO will consider the law, good industry practice and what
is fair and reasonable in all the circumstances and having regard
to a number of relevant factors.
View the TIO’s position statements on the Extension
of Unlimited Credit and Over-Commitment
Mobile Commerce Regulation and the
Regulation of Premium Rate Services
The TIO has provided the Australian Communications Authority with
a response to its Mobile Commerce Regulatory and Policy Outlook
Discussion Paper, with particular reference to:
- The issues of extension of unlimited credit
- Fraud and stolen mobile phones
- Customer dispute resolution considerations and TIO jurisdiction
The TIO has also provided the ACA with a response to its discussion
paper regarding the need for additional regulatory measures in relation
to the supply of premium rate services.
Anyone interested in the TIO’s submissions on this matters
can contact the TIO on 03 8600 8700 or tio@tio.com.au.
Online Alternative Dispute Resolution
In the 2002/03 financial year less than 5% of complaints to the
TIO were lodged electronically – via email or over the Internet.
In the year before that less than 3% of complaints were lodged in
this manner. More than 90% of consumers chose to lodge their complaint
over the phone.
With this in mind, it is interesting to note that a number of Australian
and international consumer complaint bodies are giving serious consideration
to online ADR as an alternative to existing face-to-face or over-the-phone
dispute resolution methods.
The Department of Justice Victoria recently commissioned a three-part
research project about online alternative dispute resolution, or
online ADR, with a view to determining whether online ADR could
be incorporated into the services currently offered by the Department
to Victorians. The International Conflict Resolution Centre at the
University of Melbourne undertook the study.
Online alternative dispute resolution involves moving traditional
modes of ADR, including complaint handling, arbitration, mediation,
facilitated negotiation and negotiation support, into an exclusively
online setting.
Online ADR services have been readily available since 1996 in North
America, and Europe and Asia have experienced a rapid increase the
availability of such services in recent years. The first Australian
online ADR site was launched in 2002. National bodies investigating
or promoting the use of online ADR in Australia include the Australian
Law Reform Commission, the Consumer Affairs Bureau and the Department
of the Treasury (Cwth). The New South Wales Retail Tenancy Unit
permits various preliminary exercises to be undertaken online prior
to the face-to-face mediations between the parties.
The benefits of increased access, reduced costs and concerns about
consumer protection in a borderless marketplace appear to be encouraging
the development of online ADR in Australia. At the same time, access
to minimum hardware and software support, accessibility to ADR sites
by people with disabilities and barriers imposed by language and
comprehension, may place limitations on its widespread use.
Anyone interested in the study can contact Ms Elisabeth Opie, Editor-in-Chief
of the Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration
via email at eopie@maa.net
Telecommunications and Financial
Hardship Issues
On 23 October 2003 the TIO and ACA co-hosted an industry roundtable
on Credit Management and Hardship Issues. Six major telecommunications
providers – Telstra, Optus, Vodafone, Primus, AAPT and Hutchison
– attended and provided advice regarding regulatory, credit
management and customer relations practices.
The ACA and TIO have become concerned in recent months at the upward
trend in complaints recorded by the TIO in relation to credit management
matters. While a number of factors have contributed to the growth
in complaint statistics, the handling of hardship customers has
been an area of particular concern.
In an attempt to contextualise this issue, the ACA commissioned
a report from Kildonan Child and Family Services, a welfare agency
operating in the northern suburbs of Melbourne, on the experiences
of their financial counsellors in dealing with telecommunications
companies. The report confirmed that the telecommunications industry’s
treatment of financial hardship cases is an issue that needs to
be addressed.
The key outcome of the forum was a recognition by the telecommunications
industry of the need to develop and commit to a set of principles
which will guide industry participants in sustaining relationships
with customers suffering hardship.
AGM and Board Elections
The TIO conducted its Annual General Meeting at the Crowne Plaza
in Sydney at 10 AM on 4 December 2003. The meeting was preceded
by a General Meeting of ISP Members and a General Meeting of non-ISP
Members (excluding Telstra, Optus and Vodafone) to elect Board Members
from those constituencies.
Staff Changes at the TIO
Enquiry Officer Amanda Bradford left the TIO in June to take up
a role as an investigator with the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission (ASIC). Legal Investigation Officer, Shirley Quo, left
in August to work in academia. Amanda and Shirley will both be sorely
missed by the TIO. We wish them all the best in the future.
In July, Stephen Kinna and Kate Lawler commenced as Enquiry Officers,
and Administrative Officer Brea Acton commenced as a casual Enquiry
Officer filling in on the phones when required. Stephen came to
the TIO from Transurban and Kate was formerly working in paralegal
roles.
Enquiry officers Danny Whelan and Chris Jensen were the successful
applicants for two new Investigation Officer positions and commenced
in their new roles in August.
In November, Monica Clements began acting as Quality and Training
Officer while Carrie Liddle takes 12 months leave.
Maria Chapman and Jillian Beveridge also commenced at this time
as Legal Investigation Officers. Maria has recently returned to
Australia from the UK where she was in-house counsel for McMillan
Cancer Relief. Jillian was formerly employed by the Office of Public
Prosecutions.
TIO Position Statements
A reminder that TIO Position
Statements on a wide range of issues are available. We welcome
any comments or feedback.
> NEXT: TIO Council & Board
|