Media Release
June 1 1999
Record telephone fault complaints to the TIO
Complaints about telephone faults to the Telecommunications Industry
Ombudsman (TIO) have risen to an all time high of almost 12% of
cases according to the TIOs quarterly newsletter, TIO Talks.
Telephone faults include static on the line, calls dropping out,
no dial tone, crossed lines, and not being able to make or receive
calls. They can be caused by storm damage, floods or heavy rain,
accidents that affect telephone lines, animals or birds eating through
or machinery cutting cabling and general wear and tear.
Some states have experienced severe weather conditions in
recent months. However, a comparison of quarterly figures over the
past two years shows the proportion of complaints about faults has
been rising steadily. This trend has continued into the March quarter
and resulted in the highest proportion of complaints about faults
ever recorded by the TIO, said Ombudsman Mr John Pinnock.
Proportion of Complaints to the TIO About Telephone Faults
| Quarter Ended |
% |
Quarter Ended |
% |
% Point
Increase |
| March 1999 |
11.8 |
March 1998 |
9.8 |
2 |
| December 1998 |
7.3 |
December 1997 |
6.6 |
7 |
| September 1998 |
7.6 |
September 1997 |
4.8 |
2.8 |
| June 1998 |
8.3 |
June 1997 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
More than 75% of fault complaints made this quarter were about delays
in fault repair; the remainder related to recurring faults and missed
appointments.
Mr Pinnock explained that the Customer Service Guarantee (CSG) provides
a means for claiming compensation for delays in fault repair but
phone companies can be exempt from the guarantee if a fault is the
result of circumstances beyond the companys control.
Due to bad weather in a number of states in the last few months,
carriers have claimed exemptions from making CSG payments to many
customers who have experienced faults caused by weather damage
Mr Pinnock said.
Customers should report faults to their phone company, find out
how long it will take to repair, and allow time for the company
to make the repair.
If the fault continues the TIO advises consumers to contact the
company again, as a technician may have attended to the fault and
believed it to be fixed. After a failed repair attempt, a fault
should receive priority attention.
The CSG states that a fault in a metropolitan area must be repaired
by the end of the next full working day after it is reported, by
the end of the second working day in rural areas and at the end
of the third working day in remote areas.
If these time limits are not met, the customer is entitled to claim
compensation which is payable at the rate of the monthly line rental
for every working day of delay after five days of delay it
is payable at 40 dollars for every working day of delay. Compensation
is also payable if a technician misses an appointment. Carriers
are required to advise customers of their rights under the CSG.
The TIO can investigate complaints about faults if the customer
and company have not been able to sort out the problem. The TIO
will ask the company to provide an explanation for the fault and
may request technical testing to be carried out. It will determine
a repair date, negotiate interim service for the customer and ensure
that compensation is paid if due.
The TIO is a free service. As the TIO is an office of last resort,
customers must try to resolve complaints with their phone company
or Internet Service Provider before contacting the TIO. Complaints
can be lodged on freecall 1800 062 058 or at www.tio.com.au.
Backgrounder - TIO Talks 16
Tuesday 1 June 1999
State distribution of telephone fault complaints from 1 January
1999 to 31 March 1999
| State |
% |
| New South Wales |
43.1 |
| Western Australia |
5.4 |
| Victoria |
25.6 |
| South Australia |
4.6 |
| Queensland |
12.6 |
| ACT |
1.7 |
| Tasmania |
5.5 |
| Northern Territory |
1.5 |
The TIO logged a total of 15, 712 cases in the quarter ending
31 March, 1999, a 23.6% increase from the previous quarter.
A total of 1,755 complaints to the TIO for the quarter were
about telephone faults.
More than 1,500 complaints about customer transfers were logged
for the quarter, accounting for 10% of telephone service complaints
- up from 9.3% last quarter and 8.5% the quarter before.
Complaints about mobile phones rose this quarter from 8.2%
to 10.4% of telephone service cases. Most complaints were about
disputed contracts, others related to coverage, and equipment and
network problems.
Cases against Internet service providers made up 5.3% of TIOs
cases compared to 5% the previous quarter.
Thirty-eight complaints about Internet privacy issues were
logged, compared with 17 cases last quarter.
| Major Telephone Service Issues |
% |
Major Telephone Service Issues |
% |
| Billing |
30.8 |
Billing |
55.1 |
| Connection/Service Provision |
13.4 |
Access |
17.2 |
| Faults |
11.8 |
Contracts |
7.5 |
| Mobiles |
10.4 |
Provision of Service |
5 |
| Customer Transfer |
10.2 |
Privacy |
4.6 |
| Credit Control |
7.3 |
|
|
Privacy
|
2.8 |
|
|
Telephone Fault Case Studies
Case 1
A man living in a regional area arranged two weeks in advance
to have a phone connected at his new metropolitan residential
address. Prior to moving in he was informed by the phone company
that the new line had been tested and no faults had been found.
However, on calling his new number he received a constant engaged
signal. After a number of calls to the company, a technician visited
the mans house and found wiring and cable problems. Three
weeks after the mans initial request to have the phone connected,
the fault was fixed. In accordance with the Customer Service Guarantee
(CSG), the company credited the mans account one months
line rental for every working day of delay after the fault was
first reported.
Case 2
A woman in a metropolitan area reported that her phone was
dead following an electrical storm. The fault, the result of a
lightning strike, was repaired 10 days later. The woman requested
compensation under the Customer Service Guarantee (CSG) which
requires faults in metropolitan areas to be repaired by the end
of the next working day after being reported. However, the phone
carrier argued that, as the fault was due to circumstances beyond
its control, it was exempt from paying compensation. The company
wrote to the woman apologising for the inconvenience caused by
the fault. The woman was one of a large number of people affected
by the storms who were ineligible to claim CSG compensation.
Case 3
A small retailer experienced a fault on his phone which prevented
him from using EFTPOS facilities. As the fault was repaired within
the CSG time limit (by the end of the next working day after it
had been reported), the shop owner was not entitled to compensation
under the CSG. However, the shop owner claimed that his business
had suffered over the 27 hours he was without EFTPOS facilities.
The TIO advised the man to collect evidence of his loss of income
and lodge a compensation claim with the phone company for loss
of business.
Ends
An electronic copy of TIO Talks 17 is available on the TIO website,
www.tio.com.au.
For further media information, please contact TIO Public Affairs on 03 8600 8738 or 0403 601 532.
To subscribe to our mailing list and receive media release email alerts please click here.
|