Telephone transfer delays
Table of contents
Introduction
The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) receives complaints
from consumers about delays in the processing of their applications
to transfer services from one telephone or internet provider to
another.
We receive complaints about transferring the following types of
services:
- landline services, on the same or a different carrier network
- the long distance part of landline services, e.g. national
calls, international calls and calls to mobile telephones.
- mobile services/numbers
| Gaining
Service Provider
In this statement, when we refer to the gaining service provider
we mean the provider the consumer wishes to transfer to.
Losing Service Provider
In this statement, when we refer to the losing service provider
we mean the provider the consumer wishes to transfer away
from. |
Time-frames for processing
transfers
The telecommunications industry has developed a number of processes
for the transfer of services. A list of these processes is
at the end of this document. Under these processes, different types
of services must be transferred within different time–frames.
When a consumer first contacts us about a transfer delay we may
not know which time-frame applies, because it may not be clear exactly
which industry process is involved. However, we use the following
time-frames as a guide to help us decide whether we can investigate
a complaint.
| Nature
of transfer request |
Time-frame |
| Landline services (where both the local and long
distance parts of the service are transferring) |
15 business days |
| Long distance component of a landline service |
5 business days |
| Mobile services/numbers |
2 business days |
When a consumer first
contacts the TIO about a transfer delay
When the TIO receives a complaint about a transfer delay, we seek
answers to the following questions:
- What service does the consumer want to transfer?
- Which service providers are involved?
- When did the consumer ask to transfer the service?
- How did the consumer ask to transfer the service, e.g. did
they authorise it during a telephone call or by completing a form?
- How many days have passed since the consumer first asked to
transfer the service?
- Has the time-frame for transferring this type of service passed?
- What explanation has the gaining service provider given for
the delay in processing the transfer?
We will generally refer the consumer to the gaining service provider’s
senior level of complaint and ask them to contact us again if the
provider has not:
- transferred the service within the relevant time frame (in
the table above), or
- addressed the delay issues within 48 hours of referral, if
the relevant time-frame has already passed.
| Important:
addressing a transfer delay does not mean that the transfer
must be completed within 48 hours.
Addressing a transfer delay means:
- completing any action required to fix any problem
causing a delay, so that the transfer process can proceed
to completion, or
- advising a consumer that the transfer cannot proceed,
and explaining why. On this point, we accept that sometimes
transfers cannot proceed, for example if the legal lessee
has not authorised the transfer, the gaining service
provider has decided not to accept the customer on the
basis of their credit history, or the service has been
disconnected.
|
If a complaint about
a transfer is not resolved after referral to the gaining service
provider’s senior level of complaint
If a consumer claims that the gaining service provider’s
senior level of complaint did not take steps to address the transfer
delay within 48 hours of the TIO referral, we would generally escalate
the complaint to Level 2 status.
As part of our investigation, we will ask the provider to advise:
- whether there is a transfer delay
- which industry code of practice or process applies to the transfer
delay
- which stage has been reached in the relevant transfer process
- what has caused the transfer delay
- what can be done to address the transfer delay, and
- what, if any, action may be appropriate to redress any financial
disadvantage resulting from any delay.
We ask the gaining service provider to address any delay and respond
to us within 48 hours, so that delays do not extend well beyond
the time-frames set by the industry. We will also facilitate communication
between the gaining and losing service providers, if this is required
to identify the source of the delay.
Where a transfer delay is not addressed within 48 hours of the
complaint being escalated, we would not escalate the complaint to
Level 3 status until our standard 21–day time-frame for responding
to Level 2 complaints has passed.
References
Last updated: 27 November 2007
Next: Debt
severance following transfer of service
|