Contents
1. From the Ombudsman’s desk: Complaints are a fact
of life
2. Ombudsman receives Australia Day Honours
3. TIO to launch new Disability Action Plan
4. Effective complaint handling strategies - how good policy can achieve
good results
5. Automatic Email Notification of Pending Level 2 Complaints to commence
in February 2008
1. From the Ombudsman’s desk: Complaints are a
fact of life
Ombudsman Schemes operate across a variety of industry and government
sectors, and at the TIO we learn from similar schemes about common issues
in complaint handling. While across all sectors there is growing complexity
of complaints and growing consumer awareness of complaint avenues, all
complaints have characteristics, which, once recognised, are important
business intelligence.
The office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman has been handling complaints
from the public for thirty years. Professor John McMillan, the current
Commonwealth Ombudsman, recently presented ten lessons about complaint
handling that emerged from thirty years of listening to what the public
has to say about government*. These ten lessons, in my view, are extremely
relevant to the telecommunications sector and I want to cover these in
upcoming newsletters.
Complaints are a fact of life
Professor McMillan’s first lesson highlights that problems occur
in every organisation and in every system, no matter how well designed
or how efficient. Complaints are a fact of life and an organisation that
says that it never receives complaints may be saying that it does not
learn from its mistakes. Such a company may miss growth opportunities.
There are four key factors that mean that complaints are inevitable:
- People in business make mistakes: this might be recording facts incorrectly,
misplacing documents, miscalculating credits/adjustments, forgetting
to update details.
- The choice of products and services offered in today’s market
is more prolific and complex than ever and every individual consumer
reaction is impossible to predict.
- Every service or product comes with a set of rules and for every
rule there is a chance there will be a person that falls just outside
that rule and wants to complain.
- Despite all the new technologically enhanced ways to communicate,
complaints are often about a breakdown in communication and a lack of
understanding about what a business can offer or what it promises to
its customer, rather than technical fixes.
If a company is willing to recognise that complaints are a part of business,
having an appropriate complaint handling system in place will help to
resolve individual complaints quickly and will also be a good source of
information to help recognise and quickly resolve systemic problems.
* Thirty
Years of Complaint Handling – What have we learnt?
Prof. John McMillan, Commonwealth Ombudsman
The TIO is a member of Australia and New Zealand Ombudsman Association
www.anzoa.com.au
Deirdre O’Donnell also writes a regular column for Communicate,
the Communications Alliance newsletter
2. Ombudsman receives Australia Day Honours
Congratulations to Deirdre O’Donnell who was awarded a Western
Australian Public Service Medal for outstanding public service as the
State Ombudsman for Western Australia.
The Chair of the Council of the TIO, Ms Virginia Hickey, said the award
was due recognition of Ms O'Donnell's outstanding leadership skills.
"The TIO is fortunate to have a person of Deirdre's calibre as Ombudsman
and on behalf of the Council I offer her our warmest congratulations."
3. TIO to launch new Disability Action Plan
On 28 February 2008, the TIO will launch its new Disability Action Plan.
The purpose of the TIO’s Second Disability Action Plan 2008 - 2010
is to ensure that the policies and practices of the office of the Telecommunications
Industry Ombudsman (TIO) treat people with disabilities equitably, and
are inclusive of all its stakeholders including complainants, potential
complainants, members, visitors, community organisations, government bodies
and TIO staff. The Second Disability Action (DAP) builds on the TIO’s
inaugural DAP (registered with the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity
Commission, April 2003).
By adopting this DAP we are seeking to ensure that all people have equal
access to the TIO’s services and are not restricted by physical,
communication or attitudinal barriers.
The Federal legislation governing disability access is the Disability
Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA). The aim of the DDA is to maintain the human
rights, dignity and equality of people with disabilities by giving them
access to mainstream information and services.
From 28 February 2008 you will be able to access a copy of the DAP online.
Alternatively, you can contact Byron Thompson for a copy of the DAP in
a format to best suit your needs.
Contact: members@tio.com.au or
see the website for other
contact methods.
4. Effective complaint handling strategies - how
good policy can achieve good results
Incentive-based payment arrangements have proven, in other industries,
to be an effective way of collecting money from consumers who encounter
difficulties paying unexpectedly high bills.
The Energy and Water Ombudsman of Victoria
(EWOV) shares a case study that shows how a well-planned hardship
and credit management policy can result in a win/win outcome to a complaint
that may have seemed straightforward at first telling.
Mr W had received two higher than expected electricity bills —
$1,854.00 for the period September 2005 to December 2005 and $1,163.15
for March 2006 to June 2006. His usual quarterly bills were between $200
and $400. He said that his electricity retailer told him the bills were
based on actual meter reads and correctly reflected his usage.
Contacted by EWOV, the electricity retailer confirmed this. It also confirmed
that neither a meter test nor an energy audit had been conducted.
EWOV’s review of Mr W’s bills showed that the bill for September
2005 to December 2005 was based on an actual meter read — but included
a catch-up amount because his previous bill was based on an estimate.
EWOV also found that, although Mr W’s usage increased in the March
2006 to June 2006 billing period, it fell again the following period.
EWOV obtained a meter test and arranged for an on-site energy audit.
The meter was shown to be working correctly. The energy audit indicated
that more electricity was being used at the property than would be expected
with the current appliances and only one occupant. The heater was found
to be faulty. The retailer acknowledged the energy audit, but pointed
out that the electricity had been used and it was Mr W’s equipment
that was faulty. Following the investigation, EWOV found that the retailer
had charged the consumer correctly.
Mr W didn’t want to pay the bills off and, before contacting EWOV,
he hadn’t been making payments.
Recognising the financial situation the high bills placed Mr W in, the
retailer credited his account with $300. To help him pay the remainder
off, the retailer offered him a 3:1 incentive plan. For every three monthly
payments of $225 he made in the next 12 months, it would credit his account
with a payment of $225. Providing he stuck to the payment arrangement,
he’d receive a total credit of $900 (4 x $225). Mr W was satisfied
with this arrangement.
Without this agreement, the debt may otherwise have entered a drawn-out
debt collection process with no guarantees that any money would ultimately
be paid. In this situation, the energy retailer’s incentive plan
meant that it would be recouping a large proportion of the bill and avoiding
debt recovery costs.
To find out where you can find more information about effective hardship
and credit management policies, contact the Member Communications Department
at members@tio.com.au.
5. Automatic Email Notification of Pending Level
2 Complaints to commence in February 2008
As you would be aware, the TIO’s Member Communications section
has been working with Members notifying them weekly of complaints that
have been reclassified from Level 1 to Pending Level 2.
Member response so far has been positive and the data provided has allowed
Members to follow up with their customers and save tens of thousand dollars
in TIO costs.
From 15 February 2008, in lieu of the weekly spreadsheet,
you will receive an automatic email notification as soon
as a complaint is classified at Pending Level 2. The email will be sent
to the same email address as Level 1 automatic email notifications.
What difference will automatic email notification make?
• The basic difference is that Pending level 2 notifications will
“trickle” in rather than arrive in a batch each week.
• Another difference is that you may have to organise a way to
manage the data supplied as it will not necessarily arrive in the inbox
Member Communications has been using so far to notify you of Pending Level
2. The notification will now go to the same email as Level 1 notification.
If you would like to confirm that you have email notification set up
or if you have any queries, please contact Byron Thompson on 03 8600 8787.
|